Skip to content
Unified Evidential System

Nothing looks wrong — until you look over time.

Decisions are made on static information. Reality evolves independently. RippleXn reconstructs the timeline — so you can test whether the story holds.

System Trace: Entity_7821RECON_MODE
Alignment change observedT + 14m

Remote sensing indicates site activity inconsistent with stated operational position.

Interactive scenario

Move forward in time

Explore an example: evidence layers feeding a chronological record, with alignment and uncertainty shown explicitly.

Request scope discussion
Current point
T0: Narrative base established
2021-03-10
Alignment: PartialUncertainty: ElevatedHuman review: Pre-export
T0T1T2T3T4
Record at T0
Reported
Supplier asserts compliance and completed capacity expansion.
Observed
Baseline satellite captured. Company filings current. Trade press echoes supplier claims without independent verification.
Missing / verification requirement
Independent confirmation of expansion completion.
What changed
Verification requirement surfaced: Independent confirmation of expansion completion.
Evidence layer
Procurement portal2021-03-10RXN-1421
Supplier RFP response: capacity and compliance statement

Supplier asserts capacity expansion completed in Q4 and full compliance with requirements.

reported

Unified Evidence

We ingest what decision-makers actually face.

VDR documents, filings, government reports, hearings, transcripts, correspondence, and independent signals — bound to a single chronological record.

Primary ingestion is client-provided evidence. Supplementary public sources are added where required for reconciliation.

VDR / Disclosures (PDFs)
Regulatory Filings & Registers
Government Reports & Hearings
Press / OSINT / Chronology Signals
Video Transcripts (Hearings, Media)
Audio & Call Transcripts
Email / Teams / Internal Comms
Satellite / Remote Sensing
Public Records
Client Systems / Export Feeds

The System

One system. Multiple sources. One timeline.

A single evidence store with integrity verification, extraction, and tenant-isolated search — producing chronology-first outputs supported by human review.

  • Unified Data ModelEvery ingest point maps to a universal temporal schema.
  • Queryable TruthDirectly query for narrative/evidence divergence across any period.
Forensic Review Layer
  • Outputs assembled under human forensic review before export.
  • Designed for environments where statements may be tested later.
  • Evidence indexed, traceable, and reproducible.
  • Human forensic analysts validate critical divergences before delivery.
// Initialize analysis core
const rxn = await RippleXn.init();
// Query for divergence
const result = await rxn.query({entity: "supplier_7821",scope: "CHRONO_ALIGNMENT"});
{ "status": "MISALIGNMENT_DETECTED", "confidence": 0.94 }

Situations

A system for every high-stakes decision.

Scenario Context

Supplier 12% cheaper than market baseline.

Reconciliation shows cost advantage is built on unpriced environmental liability detected via remote sensing.
System Output
"Price reflects deferred exposure."
Request full record
0
Sync Gaps
1
Temporal Model
10
Evidence Source Types

Architecture

Built as a unified system.

No separate systems to reconcile. We treat every data point as a node on a single temporal graph. This ensures consistency from ingest to board-ready export.

Method Trust
  • Multidisciplinary forensic review before final export.
  • Outputs designed to withstand board, audit, arbitration, or cross-examination.
  • Privilege-aware workflows and reproducible evidence chains.
  • Evidence indexed across all source types with full provenance.
  • Human analysts validate critical divergences before delivery.
  • No autonomous conclusions: every output is reviewed, not generated.
Human Review Process
  • Every reconstruction is reviewed by a senior analyst before export.
  • Divergences flagged by automated systems are validated by a second reviewer.
  • Final reports carry a named review signature, not a model confidence score.
  • Escalation paths exist for material ambiguity or privilege-sensitive findings.

Developed from engagement across forensic signals intelligence, multi-jurisdiction diligence, and regulatory advisory environments. Team backgrounds span government intelligence, Big Four forensic, and specialist litigation support.

If you have to stand over the decision, you should be able to stand over the evidence.

Engagement

Begin a confidential discussion

Every engagement starts with a scoping conversation. Describe the decision environment and we will outline what a reconstruction would involve.

Location

London, United Kingdom

We’ll respond within one working day.