Nothing looks wrong — until you look over time.
Decisions are made on static information. Reality evolves independently. RippleXn reconstructs the timeline — so you can test whether the story holds.
Remote sensing indicates site activity inconsistent with stated operational position.
Move forward in time
Explore an example: evidence layers feeding a chronological record, with alignment and uncertainty shown explicitly.
Request scope discussionSupplier asserts capacity expansion completed in Q4 and full compliance with requirements.
Unified Evidence
We ingest what decision-makers actually face.
VDR documents, filings, government reports, hearings, transcripts, correspondence, and independent signals — bound to a single chronological record.
Primary ingestion is client-provided evidence. Supplementary public sources are added where required for reconciliation.
The System
One system. Multiple sources. One timeline.
A single evidence store with integrity verification, extraction, and tenant-isolated search — producing chronology-first outputs supported by human review.
- Unified Data ModelEvery ingest point maps to a universal temporal schema.
- Queryable TruthDirectly query for narrative/evidence divergence across any period.
- Outputs assembled under human forensic review before export.
- Designed for environments where statements may be tested later.
- Evidence indexed, traceable, and reproducible.
- Human forensic analysts validate critical divergences before delivery.
Situations
A system for every high-stakes decision.
Supplier 12% cheaper than market baseline.
Architecture
Built as a unified system.
No separate systems to reconcile. We treat every data point as a node on a single temporal graph. This ensures consistency from ingest to board-ready export.
- Multidisciplinary forensic review before final export.
- Outputs designed to withstand board, audit, arbitration, or cross-examination.
- Privilege-aware workflows and reproducible evidence chains.
- Evidence indexed across all source types with full provenance.
- Human analysts validate critical divergences before delivery.
- No autonomous conclusions: every output is reviewed, not generated.
- Every reconstruction is reviewed by a senior analyst before export.
- Divergences flagged by automated systems are validated by a second reviewer.
- Final reports carry a named review signature, not a model confidence score.
- Escalation paths exist for material ambiguity or privilege-sensitive findings.
Developed from engagement across forensic signals intelligence, multi-jurisdiction diligence, and regulatory advisory environments. Team backgrounds span government intelligence, Big Four forensic, and specialist litigation support.
If you have to stand over the decision, you should be able to stand over the evidence.
Engagement
Begin a confidential discussion
Every engagement starts with a scoping conversation. Describe the decision environment and we will outline what a reconstruction would involve.
Location
London, United Kingdom